Goethe's Mephistopheles: Essential Traits of Mephisto

Authors

  • კონსტანტინე ბრეგაძე ივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახლობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტი Author

Keywords:

Goethe, “Faust”, Faust, Mephistopheles, Onomastics.

Abstract

  1. As a character, Mephistopheles encompasses numerous dimensions, a rare occurrence in the pantheon of world literary characters. Specifically, as a fictional figure, Mephistopheles evinces an explicit proclivity toward emphasizing distinct traits, including philosophical world-view, anthropological, ontological (related to existence), gnoseological (related to cognition), axiological, mental, ethical and sociocultural dimensions.
  2. The attributes that strike us as essential to Mephistopheles are as follows:

a)Antropological (related to human essence) trait- Mephistopeles personifies inconscient, irrational part of human makeup, instinct, libidinality, sexuality, vitality, corporality.

b)Ontological (related to existence) trait- Mephistopheles personifies the irrational part of the world’s makeup- vigor/will (“Kraft”/”Wille” in German) and also the world’s initial darkness/tenebrosity (“Finsternis” in German).

c)Gnoseological (related to cognition) trait- Mephistopheles personifies skeptical, nihilistic conscience and nonmetaphysical cognition.

d)Axiological (related to values) trait- Mephistopheles as an essence which is disposed to favor mercantile-consumeristic values.

e)Mental trait- Mephistopheles personifies materialistic conscience.

f)Existential trait- Mephistopheles personifies existential inanity, “eternal emptiness” (“das Ewig-Leere” in German) i.e nothingness.

g)Philosophical world-view- Mephistopheles personifies materialistic, radical enlightenment.

h)Ethical trait- Mephistopheles personifies immoralism. He is an essence which is beyond moral categories of “good” and “evil”.

i)Historical and sociocultural trait-Mephistopheles personifies utilitarian, colonizational, expansionistic and violating spirit of the modern.

 

 

References

  1. ბრეგაძე, კ. (2024). გოეთეს „ფაუსტი“: სიმბოლიკა და პოეტიკა, თბილისი: „მერიდიანი“

    Anderegg, J. (2013). Zum Teufel mit dem >>heiligen Original<<. Überschreibung biblischer

    Vorlagen in Goethes „Faust“, Goethe-Jahrbuch, Bd. 130, p. 109-122, Göttingen: Wallstein

    Gaier, U. (2001).  Erläuterungen  und  Dokumente: Johann  Wolfgang  Goethe. “Faust. Der

    Tragödie Erster Teil”, Stuttgart: Reclam

    Goethe, J. W. (2000). Faust. Der Tragödie Erster Teil, Stuttgart: Reclam

    Goethe, J. W. (2001). Faust. Der Tragödie Zweiter Teil, Stuttgart: Reclam

    Schmidt, J. (2011). Goethes “Faust”. Erster und Zweiter Teil. Grundlagen – Werk – Wirkung, 

    1. Aufl., München: Beck

    Vaget, H. R. (2002). „Mäßig boshaft“: Fausts Gefährte. Goethes Mephistopheles im Lichte

    der Aufklärung, Goethe-Jahrbuch, Bd. 118, p. 234-246, Weimar: Böhlaus

     

 

text and interpretation N2

Published

2024-12-12

Issue

Section

სტატიები